From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f8DLQ2c14651
	for linux-mips-outgoing; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:26:02 -0700
Received: from ocean.lucon.org (c1473286-a.stcla1.sfba.home.com [24.176.137.160])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f8DLQ1e14648
	for <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:26:01 -0700
Received: by ocean.lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 8639E125C3; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:26:00 -0700
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Kjeld Borch Egevang <kjelde@mips.com>
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Error in gcc version 2.96 20000731
Message-ID: <20010913142600.A31274@lucon.org>
References: <20010913141454.A30909@lucon.org> <NFBBKGGKGLLGNBGCEPKIKEHDCAAA.kjelde@mips.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <NFBBKGGKGLLGNBGCEPKIKEHDCAAA.kjelde@mips.com>; from kjelde@mips.com on Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:22:46PM +0200
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:22:46PM +0200, Kjeld Borch Egevang wrote:
> I get your point. A bit suprising though. Do you consider it a bug?

It is an alias bug in your example.


H.J.