From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>,
Ryan Murray <rmurray@cyberhqz.com>,
linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:53:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010917155325.A25017@lucon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010917154001.D30386@redhat.com>; from rth@redhat.com on Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 03:40:01PM -0700
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 03:40:01PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 03:55:09AM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > It is. Yet I wouldn't like to assign a different meaning to -fpic and
> > -fPIC as most makefiles make little difference between these two options,
> > so that would imply quite some overhead.
>
> There is already such a difference. Sparc uses 13-bit GOT offsets
> with -fpic and 32-bit offsets with -fPIC. I'm considering changes
> to Alpha to use a 16/32 split for pic/PIC.
Can you mix object files compiled with -fPIC/-fpic on Sparc/Alpha?
H.J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-17 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-16 12:17 linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Petter Reinholdtsen
2001-09-16 16:16 ` H . J . Lu
2001-09-16 16:29 ` Wilbern Cobb
2001-09-16 16:29 ` Wilbern Cobb
2001-09-16 22:07 ` Petter Reinholdtsen
2001-09-16 22:38 ` Ryan Murray
2001-09-16 22:50 ` H . J . Lu
2001-09-17 1:55 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-09-17 22:40 ` Richard Henderson
2001-09-17 22:53 ` H . J . Lu [this message]
2001-09-17 22:56 ` Richard Henderson
2001-09-17 23:06 ` H . J . Lu
2001-09-17 23:01 ` Jakub Jelinek
2001-09-17 22:47 ` Richard Henderson
2001-09-17 22:56 ` Jakub Jelinek
2001-09-20 22:52 ` Geoff Keating
2001-09-26 10:08 ` Erik Corry
2001-09-16 22:50 ` Wilbern Cobb
2001-09-16 22:50 ` Wilbern Cobb
2001-09-17 1:50 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010917155325.A25017@lucon.org \
--to=hjl@lucon.org \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=rmurray@cyberhqz.com \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.