From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@transmeta.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Patch to ymfpci (set_current_state repositioning)
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:59:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010917215901.A17220@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
Dear Linus,
please consider the patch below for 2.4.10. Suggested by Arjan van
de Ven and confirmed with Alan, DaveM (I hope that I understood right
what they explained to me).
Yours,
-- Pete
--- linux-2.4.9/drivers/sound/ymfpci.c Sun Aug 12 10:51:42 2001
+++ linux-2.4.9-niph/drivers/sound/ymfpci.c Mon Sep 17 18:35:09 2001
@@ -457,11 +457,12 @@
}
#endif
+ set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
while (ypcm->running) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&unit->reg_lock, flags);
- set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule();
spin_lock_irqsave(&unit->reg_lock, flags);
+ set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&unit->reg_lock, flags);
@@ -1198,12 +1199,13 @@
ret = 0;
add_wait_queue(&dmabuf->wait, &waita);
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
while (count > 0) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&unit->reg_lock, flags);
if (unit->suspended) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&unit->reg_lock, flags);
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule();
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
if (signal_pending(current)) {
if (!ret) ret = -EAGAIN;
break;
@@ -1241,9 +1243,9 @@
is TOO LATE for the process to be scheduled to run (scheduler latency)
which results in a (potential) buffer overrun. And worse, there is
NOTHING we can do to prevent it. */
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
tmo = schedule_timeout(tmo);
spin_lock_irqsave(&state->unit->reg_lock, flags);
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
if (tmo == 0 && dmabuf->count == 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "ymfpci%d: recording schedule timeout, "
"dmasz %u fragsz %u count %i hwptr %u swptr %u\n",
@@ -1326,12 +1328,13 @@
redzone *= 3; /* 2 redzone + 1 possible uncertainty reserve. */
add_wait_queue(&dmabuf->wait, &waita);
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
while (count > 0) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&unit->reg_lock, flags);
if (unit->suspended) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&unit->reg_lock, flags);
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule();
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
if (signal_pending(current)) {
if (!ret) ret = -EAGAIN;
break;
@@ -1389,8 +1392,8 @@
if (!ret) ret = -EAGAIN;
break;
}
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule();
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
if (signal_pending(current)) {
if (!ret) ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
break;
reply other threads:[~2001-09-18 1:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010917215901.A17220@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=zaitcev@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.