From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.10-pre11
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 04:02:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010918040240.M698@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109171608310.1108-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <20010917211834.A31693@redhat.com> <20010918035055.J698@athlon.random>
In-Reply-To: <20010918035055.J698@athlon.random>; from andrea@suse.de on Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 03:50:55AM +0200
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 03:50:55AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 09:18:34PM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 05:08:37PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok, the big thing here is continued merging, this time with Andrea.
> > >
> > > I still don't like some of the VM changes, but integrating Andrea's VM
> > > changes results in (a) better performance and (b) much cleaner inactive
> > > page handling in particular. Besides, for the 2.4.x tree, the big priority
> > > is stability, we can re-address my other concerns during 2.5.x.
> >
> > What is the idea behind merging complete and total utter CRAP into the
> > tree? Lets take a few completely fubar'd hunks as examples. Let's start
> > with fs/buffer.c:
> >
> > Point 1. It doesn't compile with egcs 1.1.2. Pretty remarkable for the only
> > recommended stable compiler.
>
> Sorry, I use gcc 3.0.2, but I assume fixing the compilation trouble with
> egcs 1.1.2 is trivial. Can you show which is the interested line of
> code so we can rewrite it in a compatible manner?
ah I just got a (verbose) report about one compilation trouble with old
kernels, the 00_rwsem patch that includes this backwards compatibility
hunk wasn't applied. This is a very very minor issue. Please Linus
include this patch to fix the compilation troubles with the old
compilers:
diff -urN 2.4.10pre10/include/linux/compiler.h rwsem/include/linux/compiler.h
--- 2.4.10pre10/include/linux/compiler.h Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
+++ rwsem/include/linux/compiler.h Tue Sep 18 02:02:08 2001
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+#ifndef __LINUX_COMPILER_H
+#define __LINUX_COMPILER_H
+
+/* Somewhere in the middle of the GCC 2.96 development cycle, we implemented
+ a mechanism by which the user can annotate likely branch directions and
+ expect the blocks to be reordered appropriately. Define __builtin_expect
+ to nothing for earlier compilers. */
+
+#if __GNUC__ == 2 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < 96
+#define __builtin_expect(x, expected_value) (x)
+#endif
+
+#endif /* __LINUX_COMPILER_H */
Then you need to simply include <linux/compile.h> from the files that
doesn't compile, this second patch is untested but it should do the
trick (00_rwsem-?? was including compile.h from the rwsem includes that
were in turn included by those files implicitly so I didn't need to add
compile.h in each file):
--- 2.4.10pre11/mm/slab.c.~1~ Tue Sep 18 02:43:04 2001
+++ 2.4.10pre11/mm/slab.c Tue Sep 18 04:00:30 2001
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/compile.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
/*
--- 2.4.10pre11/mm/page_alloc.c.~1~ Tue Sep 18 02:43:04 2001
+++ 2.4.10pre11/mm/page_alloc.c Tue Sep 18 04:00:20 2001
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
#include <linux/bootmem.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/compile.h>
int nr_swap_pages;
int nr_active_pages;
--- 2.4.10pre11/mm/vmscan.c.~1~ Tue Sep 18 02:43:04 2001
+++ 2.4.10pre11/mm/vmscan.c Tue Sep 18 04:00:47 2001
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/highmem.h>
#include <linux/file.h>
+#include <linux/compile.h>
#include <asm/pgalloc.h>
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-18 2:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-18 0:08 Linux 2.4.10-pre11 Linus Torvalds
2001-09-17 23:17 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-18 1:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-18 3:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-18 2:25 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-18 3:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-18 2:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-18 4:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-18 3:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-18 5:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-18 3:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-18 5:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-18 4:14 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-18 5:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-18 5:00 ` Marcelo Tosatti
[not found] ` <20010917211834.A31693@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20010918035055.J698@athlon.random>
2001-09-18 2:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
[not found] ` <20010917221653.B31693@redhat.com>
2001-09-18 2:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-18 3:14 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-18 3:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] ` <20010918052201.N698@athlon.random>
2001-09-18 4:01 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-18 4:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-18 5:04 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-18 5:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-18 5:22 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-18 5:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-18 5:48 ` Andrew Morton
2001-09-18 6:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-18 5:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-18 6:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-18 16:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-18 19:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-09-18 21:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-19 13:57 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-18 10:58 ` Martin Dalecki
2001-09-18 9:31 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-18 9:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-18 9:44 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-18 9:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-18 10:02 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-18 10:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-18 10:28 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-18 10:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-18 10:52 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-18 11:05 ` Helge Hafting
2001-09-18 12:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-18 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-18 16:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-18 18:19 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-18 18:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-18 19:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-09-18 19:41 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-18 20:33 ` Richard Gooch
2001-09-18 20:53 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-18 21:06 ` Richard Gooch
2001-09-18 21:27 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-18 20:17 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-09-18 20:33 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-19 13:42 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-19 14:27 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-19 2:59 ` Michael Peddemors
2001-09-18 19:29 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-19 16:11 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-19 18:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-19 19:21 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-19 20:41 ` Richard Gooch
2001-09-19 20:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-19 21:17 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-19 22:15 ` Richard Gooch
2001-09-19 23:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-19 23:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-19 23:30 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-19 23:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 13:56 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-20 14:38 ` Chris Mason
2001-09-20 14:50 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-20 15:44 ` Chris Mason
2001-09-20 16:43 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-20 20:54 ` [PATCH] fs/block_dev.c cleanup Alexander Viro
2001-09-20 2:34 ` Linux 2.4.10-pre11 Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 10:52 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-20 18:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 18:33 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-20 18:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 20:41 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-20 21:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 21:40 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-20 22:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 22:20 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-20 22:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 22:44 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-20 23:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 23:11 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-21 1:50 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-21 2:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-21 3:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-21 4:00 ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-21 4:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-21 4:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-21 4:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-21 7:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-19 13:38 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-19 16:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-18 3:18 Ed Tomlinson
2001-09-18 2:31 ` Magnus Naeslund(f)
2001-09-18 2:49 ` David B. Stevens
2001-09-18 3:38 ` Ed Tomlinson
2001-09-18 3:15 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-18 4:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-09-18 6:14 Alexei Podtelezhnikov
2001-09-18 13:51 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010918040240.M698@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.