From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 09:29:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 09:29:20 -0400 Received: from mailc.telia.com ([194.22.190.4]:55545 "EHLO mailc.telia.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 09:29:09 -0400 Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 15:33:44 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Dahlqvist To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Tainting kernels for non-GPL or forced modules Message-ID: <20010922153344.A25557@telia.com> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <27975.1001164529@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <27975.1001164529@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Keith Owens wrote: > IMHO the default should be complain and taint, even though it will > generate lots of newbie questions to l-k. Wasn't it those questions that this feature was meant to prevent in the first place? -- André Dahlqvist