From: Chris Dukes <pakrat@www.uk.linux.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved reiserfs a lot, but could still be better
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:08:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010924170829.A13630@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010924174745.A8230@emma1.emma.line.org> <E15lYHC-0002zc-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E15lYHC-0002zc-00@the-village.bc.nu>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 05:08:10PM +0100
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 05:08:10PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Those drives should be blacklisted and rejected as soon as someone tries
> > to mount those pieces rw. Either the drive can make guarantees when a
> > write to permanent storage has COMPLETED (either by switching off the
> > cache or by a flush operation) or it belongs ripped out of the boxes and
> > stuffed down the throat of the idiot who built it.
>
> In which case you can choose between ancient ST-506 drives and SCSI
I thought that Andre had some information as to which devices were
compliant and which weren't.
--
Chris Dukes
The law is a code that isolates justice from public participation.
-- Stephen Marhall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-24 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-24 14:09 [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved reiserfs a lot, but could still be better Beau Kuiper
2001-09-24 14:46 ` [reiserfs-list] " Chris Mason
2001-09-24 15:32 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-24 15:45 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-24 15:47 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-24 16:08 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-24 16:08 ` Chris Dukes [this message]
2001-09-24 16:54 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-24 16:15 ` Nicholas Knight
2001-09-24 16:40 ` [reiserfs-list] " Lehmann
2001-09-24 16:53 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-24 16:57 ` [reiserfs-list] " Lehmann
2001-09-25 14:04 ` bill davidsen
2001-09-25 17:39 ` bill davidsen
2001-09-24 20:05 ` Nicholas Knight
2001-09-25 0:11 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-25 4:49 ` Nicholas Knight
2001-09-25 6:00 ` Beau Kuiper
2001-09-25 6:17 ` Nicholas Knight
2001-09-25 10:44 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-25 11:01 ` ben-lists
2001-09-25 10:42 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-25 11:07 ` Nicholas Knight
2001-09-25 14:47 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-09-25 15:13 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-25 15:23 ` John Alvord
2001-09-25 22:41 ` bill davidsen
2001-09-25 12:54 ` Jorge Nerín
2001-09-25 13:06 ` [reiserfs-list] " Chris Mason
2001-09-25 13:17 ` Matthias Andree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010924170829.A13630@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=pakrat@www.uk.linux.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.