All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kent Borg <kentborg@borg.org>
To: Michael Rothwell <rothwell@holly-springs.nc.us>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Something Broken in 2.4.9-ac15
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:20:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010925112012.C27059@borg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1001377785.1430.7.camel@gromit.house>
In-Reply-To: <1001377785.1430.7.camel@gromit.house>; from rothwell@holly-springs.nc.us on Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:29:44PM -0400

On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:29:44PM -0400, Michael Rothwell wrote:
> my swap load is at zero, which is probably where it should be (2.4.7
> would regularly be using 256MB of swap with the same applications
> running).

That got my attention.  I think something is broken here and you
are into swap but the reporting is quite wrong.

I have 192 MB in my laptop running 2.4.9-ac15 w/preemption patch
turned on.  I fired up a couple Mozilla windows, a couple Netscape
windows, Staroffice, a couple acroread windows, a couple emacs
windows, Abiword, and I forget what all.  Still no swap usage
reported.  I fired up a second X session and my computer came to a
crawl as it tried to run all those apps again.  The disk was grinding
away--it felt just like a swapping death and yet xosview and top both
reported 0 swap usage.  I don't believe it was so.

I killed most everything, and now the computer feels like it is back
to normal, but xosview thinks the CPU is pinned at 100% SYS when
nothing is going on.  I drag a window around and I get plenty of USR
and even some FREE, but let go and it goes back to 100%.

Something is broken here, me thinks.


-kb, the Kent who might go back to 2.4.9-ac12 later today and ry it
again.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-09-25 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-25  0:29 2.4.10 much better than previous 2.4.x :-) Michael Rothwell
2001-09-25  1:35 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-26  0:35   ` Paul
2001-09-26 20:08     ` José Luis Domingo López
2001-09-27  8:17       ` Helge Hafting
2001-09-28  4:53     ` Paul
2001-09-25 15:20 ` Kent Borg [this message]
2001-09-25 16:51   ` Something Broken in 2.4.9-ac15 Kent Borg
2001-09-26  0:06 ` 2.4.10 much better than previous 2.4.x :-) Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010925112012.C27059@borg.org \
    --to=kentborg@borg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rothwell@holly-springs.nc.us \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.