From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
To: rugolsky@ead.dsa.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm@bitmover.com, jgiglio@smythco.com
Subject: Re: 3ware discontinuing the Escalade Series
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 09:56:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011005095639.H14219@work.bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011004141942.A28202@lenina.bedford.smythco.com> <20011005090940.B26141@work.bitmover.com> <20011005125259.B1221@ead45>
In-Reply-To: <20011005125259.B1221@ead45>; from rugolsky@ead.dsa.com on Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 12:52:59PM -0400
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 12:52:59PM -0400, rugolsky@ead.dsa.com wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 09:09:40AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 02:19:42PM -0400, Jason Giglio wrote:
> > > 3ware has decided to discontinue their escalade series IDE RAID controller
> > > cards. The drivers were open source and in the kernel tree.
> >
> > OK, this sucks because I like those cards a lot. Before I go out and
> > stock up on a bunch of them, is there anything else out there that works
> > as well and is supported by Linux?
>
> Not that I know of; the other cards just don't seem to scale as well.
> What a shame.
I personally don't use teh 3ware raid features at all, I use the card
as a high performance interface to 4 drives and do my own backups
(I mirror each disk to /nightly, /weekly, and /monthly which is kind
of neat because you can do "$ diff foo.c /nightly/$PWD" and it works,
saves a lot of headaches).
Are there decent alternatives if all you want is a high performance
JBOD controller?
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-05 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-04 18:19 3ware discontinuing the Escalade Series Jason Giglio
2001-10-05 16:09 ` Larry McVoy
2001-10-05 16:52 ` rugolsky
2001-10-05 16:56 ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2001-10-05 17:05 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-05 18:22 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2001-10-05 18:39 ` Jeff V. Merkey
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-05 16:49 Ryan C. Bonham
2001-10-05 17:05 ` Wilson
2001-10-05 17:13 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-05 17:10 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-05 17:21 ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-10-08 17:38 ` Mike Panetta
2001-10-08 18:38 ` Joel Jaeggli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011005095639.H14219@work.bitmover.com \
--to=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=jgiglio@smythco.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rugolsky@ead.dsa.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.