From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Dilger Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 11:54:32 -0600 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Clarification Message-ID: <20011005115432.C315@turbolinux.com> References: <00ba01c14d93$70ec7340$836788cf@industry> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00ba01c14d93$70ec7340$836788cf@industry> Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Jason A. Lixfeld" Cc: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Oct 05, 2001 07:46 -0400, Jason A. Lixfeld wrote: > I'm just looking for clarification: > > ext2resize will actually resize ext3 aswell? With no extra flags? It > will just know that the LVM is ext3 and not ext2? If it is unmounted, it will work fine. There is no difference between ext2 and ext3 for a (cleanly) unmounted filesystem (the journal is just a regular file). If you try to resize a filesystem that has a dirty journal (e.g. after a crash) it will refuse to do so and you need to run e2fsck. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto, \ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?" http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ -- Dogbert