From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: "Dieter Nützel" <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Subject: Re: kswapd problems with 2.4.{9,10}
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 04:07:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011009040753.I726@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011009015922.B6F9D1E544@Cantor.suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20011009015922.B6F9D1E544@Cantor.suse.de>; from Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de on Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 03:59:16AM +0200
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 03:59:16AM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> Hallo Andrea,
>
> could this mlock related, too?
> latencytest0.42-png
>
> SunWave1>./latencytest
> mlockall() failed, exiting. mlock: Operation not permitted
>
> SunWave1>su
> Password:
>
> SunWave1#unlimit coredumpsize
> SunWave1#./latencytest
> Speicherschutzverletzung (core dumped)
>
> Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4
> Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
> #0 0x8048f91 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff344) at latencytest.c:233
> 233 if(strcmp(argv[1],"none"))
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x8048f91 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff344) at latencytest.c:233
> #1 0x400c1baf in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
> (gdb) info registers
> eax 0x0 0
> ecx 0x5 5
> edx 0xf7f 3967
> ebx 0x1 1
> esp 0xbffff224 0xbffff224
> ebp 0xbffff2dc 0xbffff2dc
> esi 0x0 0
> edi 0x804a761 134522721
> eip 0x8048f91 0x8048f91
> eflags 0x10246 66118
> cs 0x23 35
> ss 0x2b 43
> ds 0x2b 43
> es 0x2b 43
> fs 0x2b 43
> gs 0x2b 43
> fctrl 0x37f 895
> fstat 0x0 0
> ftag 0x0 0
> fiseg 0x0 0
> fioff 0x0 0
> foseg 0x0 0
> fooff 0x0 0
> fop 0x0 0
>
> It worked with 2.4.10 (-preX) and 2.4.11-pre1 (I think).
> But _NOT_ with 2.4.11-pre2+ (2.4.11-pre5 + preempt :-) currently.
Are you sure you simply didn't forgot to pass argv[1]? :)
mlockall is somehow simpler than a partial mlocks on a large vma,
mlockall doesn't need to split off the partial vmas, I was only
wondering about the other splitting path stressed by Ben's testcase.
Also there aren't been recent changes there.
>
> Do you need the coredump file?
>
> Thanks,
> Dieter
Andrea
next parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-09 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20011009015922.B6F9D1E544@Cantor.suse.de>
2001-10-09 2:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2001-10-09 1:59 kswapd problems with 2.4.{9,10} Dieter Nützel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-05 18:21 Ben Smith
2001-10-09 0:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011009040753.I726@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.