From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 23:41:58 +0200 From: Nils Juergens Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] More Segfaults with LVM 1.0.1rc3 Message-ID: <20011010234158.A14457@muon.de> References: <20011004223343.A868@balu.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> <20011005090810.B1245@sistina.com> <3BBD6084.70106@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> <20011005095737.A1460@sistina.com> <3BBD6C17.8090405@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> <20011006231826.A739@guldukat.muon.local> <20011008120207.A18314@sistina.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011008120207.A18314@sistina.com> Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com Cc: mauelshagen@sistina.com On Mon, 08.10.01, "Heinz J . Mauelshagen" wrote: > > Does LVM compiled under gcc-3.0.1 *without* optimization work? > No, with -O0 i get the same seg'fault. Nils -- > Nils Juergens | nils@muon.de | icq 7090774 < > If we all work hard, we can turn this company < > around 360 degrees -- gruntbert(LOTD) <