From: Patrick McFarland <unknown@panax.com>
To: Wilson <defiler@null.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 16:21:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011013162155.A1665@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011013141709.L249@localhost> <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0110131526500.2847-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva> <20011013144220.P249@localhost> <20011013145341.R249@localhost> <02ca01c1541d$391c5f30$c800000a@Artifact>
In-Reply-To: <02ca01c1541d$391c5f30$c800000a@Artifact>
Im using 2.4.12-linus
On 13-Oct-2001, Wilson wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Patrick McFarland" <unknown@panax.com>
> To: "Rik van Riel" <riel@conectiva.com.br>
> Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 2:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4
>
> >Also, I'd like to say about the documentation...
> >
> ><quote>
> >Currently, these files are in /proc/sys/vm:
> >- bdflush
> >- buffermem
> >- freepages
> >- kswapd
> >- overcommit_memory
> >- page-cluster
> >- pagecache
> >- pagetable_cache
> ></quote>
> >
> >but a simple ls of /proc/sys/vm reports:
> >bdflush kswapd overcommit_memory page-cluster pagetable_cache
> >
> >Shouldnt the documentation be updated, seeing for the fact it was written
> in the 2.2.10 days?
>
> I must be confused.. What kernel are you running?
> This is on 2.4.8-ac9:
> [root@aeon /root]# ls /proc/sys/vm
> bdflush freepages max_map_count min-readahead pagecache
> pagetable_cache
> buffermem kswapd max-readahead overcommit_memory page-cluster
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || unknown@panax.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-13 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-13 17:02 Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4 Patrick McFarland
2001-10-13 17:16 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-13 18:06 ` M. Edward Borasky
2001-10-13 18:17 ` Patrick McFarland
2001-10-13 18:29 ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-13 18:42 ` Patrick McFarland
2001-10-13 18:53 ` Patrick McFarland
2001-10-13 18:58 ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-13 19:04 ` Patrick McFarland
2001-10-13 19:10 ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-13 19:28 ` Wilson
2001-10-13 20:12 ` [solid]
2001-10-13 20:21 ` Patrick McFarland [this message]
2001-10-13 19:17 ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-13 18:37 ` M. Edward Borasky
2001-10-20 0:38 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-10-20 1:05 ` Robert Love
2001-10-20 19:56 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-20 20:03 ` Robert Love
2001-10-13 17:48 ` Mark Hahn
2001-10-13 21:29 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-13 21:47 ` Mark Hahn
[not found] <20011013132327.F249@localhost>
[not found] ` <E15sSey-0003Jf-00@the-village.bc.nu>
2001-10-13 17:33 ` Patrick McFarland
[not found] ` <E15sSti-0003ME-00@the-village.bc.nu>
2001-10-13 17:49 ` Patrick McFarland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011013162155.A1665@localhost \
--to=unknown@panax.com \
--cc=defiler@null.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.