From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:07:34 -0500 From: "Chad C. Walstrom" Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] problem to compile lvm-1.0.1.rc4 Message-ID: <20011017140734.B3930@wookimus.net> References: <000001c1571f$91f28f80$6c88e289@tweety> <000b01c15720$47f76490$7b02a8c0@bor1mp0999> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000b01c15720$47f76490$7b02a8c0@bor1mp0999> Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: To: linux-lvm@sistina.com --oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:27:48PM +0200, Raynaud frederic wrote: > use kgcc instead of gcc. > i have compile lvm-1.0.1.rc4 this afternoon with kgcc (the compilation > failed with gcc 2.96) Ugh. Let's qualify that statement. If you're using Red Hat, it would be wise to use their screwed up, renamed, earlier version of gcc called kgcc. gcc-2.96 wasn't stable when Red Hat packaged it and pushed it out to the world. If you're using Debian stable/testing or any other sane distribution, just use the default gcc, which should be gcc-2.95.x. --=20 Chad Walstrom | a.k.a. ^chewie http://www.wookimus.net/ | s.k.a. gunnarr Key fingerprint =3D B4AB D627 9CBD 687E 7A31 1950 0CC7 0B18 206C 5AFD --oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7zdb2DMcLGCBsWv0RAvf6AJoCpJTvmf+chT/wONc9YBDZs3cyVACfXtGk 6Kg+2Rtxh/AKreh6UUm9GCk= =dPly -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl--