From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f9ONJav12225
	for linux-mips-outgoing; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 16:19:36 -0700
Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (a1as08-p163.stg.tli.de [195.252.188.163])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f9ONJWD12222
	for <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 16:19:33 -0700
Received: (from ralf@localhost)
	by dea.linux-mips.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f9ONJJ230904;
	Thu, 25 Oct 2001 01:19:19 +0200
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 01:19:19 +0200
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
To: Klaus Naumann <spock@mgnet.de>
Cc: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com,
   binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: The Linux binutils 2.11.92.0.7 is released.
Message-ID: <20011025011919.A30889@dea.linux-mips.net>
References: <20011023171823.B3644@dea.linux-mips.net> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0110240842170.2349-100000@spock.mgnet.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0110240842170.2349-100000@spock.mgnet.de>; from spock@mgnet.de on Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 08:43:35AM +0200
X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 08:43:35AM +0200, Klaus Naumann wrote:

> So to ask again, there is no other solution than -xgot ?
> And if that's the only solution, what are the issues ? Only bigger code ?

Alternative solutions would require significant work on binutils.

  Ralf