All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@gnu.org>
To: Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@gnu.org>
Cc: "Jeffrey H. Ingber" <jhingber@ix.netcom.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Other computers HIGHLY degrading network performance (DoS?)
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:13:13 +0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011026101313.A18310@bee.lk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011026084328.A14814@bee.lk> <1004064922.21997.7.camel@Eleusis> <20011026090505.A15880@bee.lk>
In-Reply-To: <20011026090505.A15880@bee.lk>; from anuradha@gnu.org on Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 09:05:05AM +0600

On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 09:05:05AM +0600, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:55:16PM -0400, Jeffrey H. Ingber wrote:
> >
> > I think this is what QoS and the like are for.
> 
> Well, we _are_ going to solve the problem using a firewall between the router
> and the local area network.
> 
> But the real problem is a different one.
> 
> One machine begins an intensive downloading job.  How can this degrade the
> network performance even for ICMP packets between another machine and the
> router?  Notice that this can't be collitions because the download goes at
> 64kbps and the local network is 100 Mbps.  Something funny is going on to
> stop other people's packets.

Just found out that this is _not_ a problem of the "download accelerator", but
something to do with queuing algorithm of the router.  Even a normal wget
process or a big mail has a big impart on the network.  Hopefully an iptables
firewall would solve the problem.

Thanks.

Regards,

Anuradha

-- 

Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.13)

Television has brought back murder into the home -- where it belongs.
	-- Alfred Hitchcock


  reply	other threads:[~2001-10-26  4:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-26  2:43 Other computers HIGHLY degrading network performance (DoS?) Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-26  2:55 ` Jeffrey H. Ingber
2001-10-26  3:05   ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-26  4:13     ` Anuradha Ratnaweera [this message]
2001-10-26 10:56       ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2001-10-27  3:28         ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-27 10:06           ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2001-10-28  6:11             ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-26 14:01       ` Martin Josefsson
2001-10-27  3:37         ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-27  8:40           ` Martin Josefsson
2001-10-26 12:53 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-27  3:06   ` Anuradha Ratnaweera

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011026101313.A18310@bee.lk \
    --to=anuradha@gnu.org \
    --cc=jhingber@ix.netcom.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.