From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulrich Wiederhold Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm-1.0.1-rc4 and 2.4.13 Message-ID: <20011029110520.D13685@sky.net> References: <20011026005405.A21775@sky.net> <20011026095641.C587@tykepenguin.com> <20011026213005.C928@sky.net> <20011029084424.D4182@tykepenguin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20011029084424.D4182@tykepenguin.com> Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Oct 29 04:05:02 2001 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com Hello, * Patrick Caulfield [011029 09:44]: > It just isn't :-( we've submitted (most of) it to Alan Cox and his kernel= is > *much* more up-to-date than Linus'. I don't know just why the patches hav= en't > been accepted by Linus. He is apparently happy to completely replace the = VM but > won't fix some fairly serious bugs elsewhere...bizarre. I would like to run an ac-Kernel, but I could get it patched with xfs (xfs doesn=B4t support ac-kernels). > > 2. Should I write a bug-report to the xfs-guys? If yes, can I include > > your Email, Patrick? >=20 > I wouldn't like to claim it's an XFS bug as I haven't had a close look at= their > patches. I do know that they include some LVM patches in their distributi= on so > it's certainly worth asking them nicely to upgrade them I suppose. >=20 > Feel free to quote my email..I don't think I wrote anything actionable :-) Ok. :) I will do this. Uli --=20 'The box said, 'Requires Windows 95 or better', so i installed Linux - TKK 5