From: Mike Kravetz <kravetz@us.ibm.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@watson.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH][RFC] Proposal For A More Scalable Scheduler ...
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 21:29:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011030212940.A1037@w-mikek2.sequent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011030161106.F1097@w-mikek2.des.beaverton.ibm.com> <Pine.LNX.4.40.0110301629400.1495-100000@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0110301629400.1495-100000@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com>; from davidel@xmailserver.org on Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 05:06:16PM -0800
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 05:06:16PM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Chat - VolanoMark simulator. Result is a measure of throughput.
> > Higher is better.
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> How does this test work exactly ?
> Did You measure the run queue length while this was running ?
> I'm going to modify LatSched to output other info like rqlen and
> tsk->counter at switch time.
> I'd like to have a schedcnt dump while this test is running.
> Anyway this test shows that what i'm doing now ( working on the balancing
> schemes ) is not wasted time :)
Take a look at our OLS presentation slides starting at:
http://lse.sourceforge.net/scheduling/ols2001/img50.htm
This is basically a message passing (via sockets) benchmark with
high thread counts/runqueue lengths.
I'll kick off the all important 'kernel build benchmark' and have
some results tomorrow.
--
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-31 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-30 5:38 [PATCH][RFC] Proposal For A More Scalable Scheduler Davide Libenzi
2001-10-30 11:40 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-30 17:02 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-30 23:04 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-30 23:14 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-30 23:44 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-31 0:01 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-30 14:28 ` Hubertus Franke
2001-10-30 17:19 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-30 16:29 ` Hubertus Franke
2001-10-30 18:50 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-30 16:52 ` Hubertus Franke
2001-10-30 19:08 ` [Lse-tech] " Mike Kravetz
2001-10-30 19:19 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-31 0:11 ` [Lse-tech] " Mike Kravetz
2001-10-31 1:06 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-31 5:29 ` Mike Kravetz [this message]
2001-10-31 4:45 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-31 5:50 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-10-31 17:07 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-10-31 17:59 ` Davide Libenzi
[not found] <20011031151243.E1105@w-mikek2.des.beaverton.ibm.com>
2001-10-31 23:53 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-11-02 12:20 ` Hubertus Franke
2001-11-02 16:58 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-11-03 22:10 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011030212940.A1037@w-mikek2.sequent.com \
--to=kravetz@us.ibm.com \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=frankeh@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.