From: "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Cc: Lista Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cdrecord from ext3
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:59:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011031155934.A18608@werewolf.able.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011031001846.A1840@werewolf.able.es> <3BDF576F.3A797933@zip.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <3BDF576F.3A797933@zip.com.au>; from akpm@zip.com.au on Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 02:44:15 +0100
On 20011031 Andrew Morton wrote:
>"J . A . Magallon" wrote:
>
>> Kernel: 2.4.13-ac5+bproc, controller is an Adaptec
>>
>
>bproc? scyld distributed process thing, or something else?
>
Yep.
>Something strange is happening. Could you please investigate
>further? For example:
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs-1024k count=600
> time cat foo > /dev/null
>
>How long does the `cat' take on ext2 and ext3?
>
Tried several times. Basic script is:
rm -f foo
echo ext2 create:
time dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1024k count=600
sync
echo ext2 read:
time cat foo > /dev/null
rm -f foo
and results a similar to this (but read below..):
ext2 create:
600+0 records in
600+0 records out
0.02user 5.73system 0:27.43elapsed 20%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (119major+18minor)pagefaults 0swaps
ext2 read:
0.24user 4.85system 0:27.57elapsed 18%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (100major+17minor)pagefaults 0swaps
ext3 create:
600+0 records in
600+0 records out
0.00user 12.20system 1:12.28elapsed 16%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (119major+18minor)pagefaults 0swaps
ext3 read:
0.19user 6.30system 1:21.73elapsed 7%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (100major+17minor)pagefaults 0swaps
Did you noticed that the ext3 was at 20MHz, and ext2 was at 40MHz ? I
will reformat the 20MHz drive and make 2 slices, one ext2 and one ext3
to be sure not to compare apples and oranges...
--
J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you...
mailto:jamagallon@able.es
Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
Linux werewolf 2.4.13-ac5-beo #1 SMP Tue Oct 30 00:10:00 CET 2001 i686
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-31 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-30 23:18 cdrecord from ext3 J . A . Magallon
2001-10-31 1:34 ` Daniel T. Chen
2001-10-31 1:44 ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-31 14:59 ` J . A . Magallon [this message]
2001-10-31 17:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-10-31 18:40 ` Mike Castle
2001-10-31 23:40 ` M. R. Brown
2001-10-31 23:57 ` Mike Castle
[not found] ` <200110311752.JAA06153@cesium.transmeta.com>
[not found] ` <20011031192425.A1757@werewolf.able.es>
[not found] ` <3BE04AA3.7010303@zytor.com>
[not found] ` <20011102010824.C12958@werewolf.able.es>
2001-11-02 0:09 ` cdrecord from ext3 [jamagallon@able.es] J . A . Magallon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011031155934.A18608@werewolf.able.es \
--to=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.