From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Lorenzo Allegrucci <lenstra@tiscalinet.it>
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, riel@conectiva.com.br,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: new OOM heuristic failure (was: Re: VM: qsbench)
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 14:00:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011102140001.7c995186.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20011031185529.01fc4310@pop.tiscalinet.it>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0110311259570.2963-100000@imladris.surriel.com> <3.0.6.32.20011031185529.01fc4310@pop.tiscalinet.it>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 439 bytes --]
Hello Lorenzo,
please find attached next vmscan.c patch which sums up the delayed swap_out
(first patch), the fix for not swapping when nr_pages is reached, and (new) the
idea to swap more pages in one call to swap_out if priority gets higher.
I have not the slightest idea what all this does to the performance. Especially
the "more" swap_out code is a pure try-and-error type of thing. Can you do some
testing please?
Thanks,
Stephan
[-- Attachment #2: vmscan-patch2 --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1511 bytes --]
--- linux-orig/mm/vmscan.c Thu Nov 1 15:33:58 2001
+++ linux/mm/vmscan.c Fri Nov 2 13:50:31 2001
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@
static int FASTCALL(swap_out(unsigned int priority, unsigned int gfp_mask, zone_t * classzone));
static int swap_out(unsigned int priority, unsigned int gfp_mask, zone_t * classzone)
{
- int counter, nr_pages = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX;
+ int counter, nr_pages = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX * DEF_PRIORITY / priority;
struct mm_struct *mm;
counter = mmlist_nr;
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@
{
struct list_head * entry;
int max_scan = nr_inactive_pages / priority;
- int max_mapped = nr_pages*10;
+ int max_mapped = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX * DEF_PRIORITY / priority;
spin_lock(&pagemap_lru_lock);
while (--max_scan >= 0 && (entry = inactive_list.prev) != &inactive_list) {
@@ -469,16 +469,10 @@
spin_unlock(&pagecache_lock);
UnlockPage(page);
page_mapped:
- if (--max_mapped >= 0)
- continue;
+ if (max_mapped > 0)
+ max_mapped--;
+ continue;
- /*
- * Alert! We've found too many mapped pages on the
- * inactive list, so we start swapping out now!
- */
- spin_unlock(&pagemap_lru_lock);
- swap_out(priority, gfp_mask, classzone);
- return nr_pages;
}
/*
@@ -514,6 +508,14 @@
break;
}
spin_unlock(&pagemap_lru_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * Alert! We've found too many mapped pages on the
+ * inactive list, so we start swapping out - delayed!
+ * -skraw
+ */
+ if (max_mapped==0 && nr_pages>0)
+ swap_out(priority, gfp_mask, classzone);
return nr_pages;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-02 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-31 12:12 VM: qsbench Lorenzo Allegrucci
2001-10-31 12:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-10-31 15:00 ` new OOM heuristic failure (was: Re: VM: qsbench) Rik van Riel
2001-10-31 15:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-31 16:04 ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-31 17:42 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-10-31 18:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-31 17:55 ` Lorenzo Allegrucci
2001-10-31 18:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-31 21:31 ` Lorenzo Allegrucci
2001-11-02 13:00 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2001-11-02 17:36 ` Lorenzo Allegrucci
2001-10-31 17:55 ` VM: qsbench Lorenzo Allegrucci
[not found] <Pine.LNX.3.96.1011031133645.448B-100000@gollum.norang.ca>
2001-10-31 19:46 ` new OOM heuristic failure (was: Re: VM: qsbench) Linus Torvalds
[not found] <200111012108.WAA28044@webserver.ithnet.com>
[not found] ` <3.0.6.32.20011101214957.01feaa70@pop.tiscalinet.it>
2001-11-01 21:59 ` Lorenzo Allegrucci
2001-11-01 23:35 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-02 0:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-11-02 2:17 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-02 2:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-11-02 2:30 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-02 2:55 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-02 2:37 Ed Tomlinson
2001-11-02 3:01 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011102140001.7c995186.skraw@ithnet.com \
--to=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=lenstra@tiscalinet.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.