From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from puffin.external.hp.com (puffin.external.hp.com [192.25.206.4]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4C8482C for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:22:19 -0700 (MST) Received: from puffin (IDENT:grundler@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by puffin.external.hp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA17663 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:18:13 -0700 Message-Id: <200111151818.LAA17663@puffin.external.hp.com> To: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.14-pa1 seems to works fine on my B180 In-Reply-To: Message from rbradetich@uswest.net (Ryan Bradetich) of "Thu, 15 Nov 2001 00:11:00 MST." <20011115001100.A23883@beavis.ybsoft.com> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:18:13 -0700 From: Grant Grundler Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Ryan Bradetich wrote: ... > Not that this is much help, but hopefully will provide a data > point .... I found the bug in sba and it seems that ccio has the same bug. The basic problem was coalescing of DMA mapping requests was resulting in DMA requests bigger than DMA_CHUNK_SIZE. thanks to all who responded. grant ps. I found the bug pretty quickly once I enabled ASSERTs that I had embedded in the code when I wrote it.