From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Petro <petro@auctionwatch.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Logical Volume max-size?
Message-ID: <20011119111511.B25684@auctionwatch.com>
References: <20011117223754.B12510@auctionwatch.com> <003801c16ffd$757c3d50$fc00a8c0@xp> <20011117231120.C12510@auctionwatch.com> <20011119105657.F27261@golem.blacknet.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20011119105657.F27261@golem.blacknet.de>
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@sistina.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/>
Date: Mon Nov 19 13:13:02 2001
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com

On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 10:56:57AM +0100, Goetz Bock wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Nov 17 '01 at 23:11, Petro wrote:
> >     Those 3ware cards rock. Lots of disk, fast and cheap. 
> While the cards may be cool, their raid 5 implementation sucks like
> hell.
    
    Ok. We don't use 5, we're using either 0 or 1 depending on the
    machine. 

> (Don't beat me to hard, I've a backup solution for my important data)

    We have lots of volitile DBs, and backups for a db that change
    massively over an hour is sort of pointless. 

-- 
Share and Enjoy.