From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id fAR7JtJ08561 for linux-mips-outgoing; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 23:19:55 -0800 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fAR7Jqo08558 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 23:19:52 -0800 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id fAR6JoL31409; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:19:50 +1100 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:19:50 +1100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Florian Lohoff Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Status RM200 Message-ID: <20011127171950.B29424@dea.linux-mips.net> References: <20011126204509.A10341@paradigm.rfc822.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011126204509.A10341@paradigm.rfc822.org>; from flo@rfc822.org on Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 08:45:09PM +0100 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 08:45:09PM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote: > i guess the RM200 parts are untested for at least a year (possibly > even more). Does anyone work on this or does know a working > checkout date ? I'm only maintaining in the sense of making sure the default configuration still compiles. The last kernel I know is working is 2.1.73 which needs some patches that are not in the standard CVS. Even if the RM200C is broken, it's a relativly sane system and so fixing should be fairly easy. Ralf