From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: calibrating MIPS counter frequency
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 02:59:02 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011130025902.A8456@dea.linux-mips.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011129161541.14485G-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:21:46PM +0100
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:21:46PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > Better stick with the calibration procedure. The crystal oscilators used
> > in most computer systems don't provide the high accuracy of frequency
> > that is required to keep the clock accurately over long time. An RTC
> > chip which you'd probably use as reference clock is better at that so
> > should be used as the ultimate reference time in the kernel.
>
> On the contrary, the DECstation's undocumented I/O ASIC FCR (free running
> counter) driven by the TURBOchannel bus clock is said to be much more
> accurate than the DS1287 used there. And it's David L. Mills who says so,
> thus we may safely assume it's true. :-)
Whooa, Master Secundus Minutius Hora himself ;-)
Actually the accuracy of crystal oscillators may differ wildly depending
on the use in a system and environmental conditions. In case of the
SGI Indy the DS1387 RTC (which is rated at +/- 25ppm ~= 1 minute / month) is
actually more accurate.
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-30 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-28 22:25 calibrating MIPS counter frequency Jun Sun
2001-11-29 15:02 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-11-29 15:21 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-11-29 15:34 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-29 15:34 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-29 15:59 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2001-11-29 18:17 ` Jun Sun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011130025902.A8456@dea.linux-mips.net \
--to=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=jsun@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.