From: Rene Rebe <rene.rebe@gmx.net>
To: Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andre@linux-ide.org
Subject: Re: IDE controller detection 2.4 +devfs
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 01:07:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011205010718.7c964efd.rene.rebe@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200111300210.fAU2AqU06657@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20011130001138.78ab1242.rene.rebe@gmx.net> <200111300017.fAU0Hx704241@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> <20011130012752.0fd5380a.rene.rebe@gmx.net> <200111300034.fAU0YB904723@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> <20011130015538.68b09e03.rene.rebe@gmx.net> <200111300111.fAU1BLR05033@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> <20011130022637.290ad791.rene.rebe@gmx.net> <200111300210.fAU2AqU06657@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca>
Are there any new results or comments regarding this issue ??
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:10:52 -0700
Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca> wrote:
> Rene Rebe writes:
> > On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 18:11:21 -0700
> > Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca> wrote:
> >
> > > But it is actually predictable, isn't it? Think of it this way: the
> > > IDE subsystem reserves "slots" (host numbers) for installed hardware.
> > > If a piece of hardware is disabled in the BIOS, it doesn't mean that
> > > the slot won't be reserved.
> >
> > It would be nice if it would be that way - se below.
> >
> > > > (All info from my very first mail ...)
> > > >
> > > > The other bug is: On a Athlon-600 workstation based on an Irongate
> > > > board (Asus-K7M) I have to disable the first (primarry) channel of
> > > > the onbaord IDE controller, because it has problem with the UDMA-66
> > > > mode. But when I disable this channel, Linux generates a /dev/ide/host1
> > > > entry - No host0 entry is there. Sure it works - but sucks, too!
> > > > (Generates a very unstable feeling in me ...)
> > >
> > > The "host0" entry isn't shown, because it is disabled. But to say
> > > "when I disable this channel, Linux generates a /dev/ide/host1" isn't
> > > correct, and implies a problem where there isn't. The correct way to
> > > describe this is:
> > > "host0" is my primary onboard IDE controller. It might not appear if I
> > > disable it.
> > > "host1" is my secondary onboard IDE controller. It has the same name
> > > whether or not I disable the primary.
> >
> > No!!!! On the Althon box:
> > - nothing disabled in BIOS:
> > /dev/ide/host0/bus0/ - on-board primary channel
> > /deV/ide/host0/bus1/ - on-board secondary channel
> >
> > - when I disable the primary channel I get this:
> > /dev/ide/host1/bus1/ - on-board secondary channel
> >
> > So as you can see it moves!! From host0 to host1!
>
> Oh, fuck! Now I see why you're complaining. Yeah, that is busted. I
> don't know why this happens. It may be due to some deep and subtle
> workings of the IDE code.
>
> Andre: any idea why this is happening?
>
> > > And this is a Feature[tm]. It means that tomorrow when a shiny new
> > > drive arrives, you can plug it into your primary channel and enable
> > > the channel in the BIOS. You can then boot without having to fix your
> > > /etc/fstab, because /dev/ide/host1 is still pointing to the same
> > > devices.
> >
> > Yes that is a really cool advantage I now for months (over a year!)!
> > But here is the next example again:
> >
> > The K6 server (on-board ALI-Aladin-5 + PCI-Card Promisse controller):
> >
> > /dev/ide/host0/bus0/ - on-board primary channel
> > /dev/ide/host0/bus1/ - on-board secondary channel
> > /dev/ide/host2/bus0/ - Promisse primary channel
> > /dev/ide/host2/bus1/ - Promisse secondarychannel
> >
> > So where is host1 ??????
>
> Good question. I wonder what's taking up the "host1" slot?
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard....
> Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
> Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca
k33p h4ck1n6
René
--
René Rebe (Registered Linux user: #248718 <http://counter.li.org>)
eMail: rene.rebe@gmx.net
rene@rocklinux.org
Homepage: http://www.tfh-berlin.de/~s712059/index.html
Anyone sending unwanted advertising e-mail to this address will be
charged $25 for network traffic and computing time. By extracting my
address from this message or its header, you agree to these terms.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-05 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-29 23:11 IDE controller detection 2.4 +devfs Rene Rebe
2001-11-30 0:17 ` Richard Gooch
2001-11-30 0:27 ` Rene Rebe
2001-11-30 0:34 ` Richard Gooch
2001-11-30 0:55 ` Rene Rebe
2001-11-30 1:11 ` Richard Gooch
2001-11-30 1:26 ` Rene Rebe
2001-11-30 2:10 ` Richard Gooch
2001-12-05 0:07 ` Rene Rebe [this message]
2001-11-30 5:58 ` Greg KH
2001-11-30 7:56 ` Rene Rebe
2001-11-30 8:16 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011205010718.7c964efd.rene.rebe@gmx.net \
--to=rene.rebe@gmx.net \
--cc=andre@linux-ide.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.