From: Greg Hennessy <gsh@cox.rr.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: horrible disk thorughput on itanium
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 11:07:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011206110713.A8404@cox.rr.com> (raw)
I recently installed a both a Dell dual cpu 2500 server (dual 1.6 ghz
ia32 chips) and a dell 7150 (dual IA64 chips). My users complained
that the disk io speed on the itanium seemed very slow, even though
both servers have a megaraid controller with seagate cheetah
disks. Bonnie also shows the ia64 machine having worse throughput than
the ia32 machine.
[root@hydra bonnie]# cat bonnie.hydra bonnie.leo
-------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input--
--Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block---
--Seeks---
Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU
/sec %CPU
100 1765 100.0 282891 100.1 377295 100.0 2058 100.0 592709
99.5 51920.4 196.5
-------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input--
--Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block---
--Seeks---
Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU
/sec %CPU
100 17049 100.1 265197 101.0 197094 98.2 16631 100.4 675831
99.0 40400.0 191.9
Hydra is the itanium, leo is the 32 bit machine. The character io of
hydra is a factor of 10 slower than that of leo. Is this more likely a
kernel issue, or a glibc issue? Both machiness run standard redhat
7.1, and 2.4.9-12smp kernels.
next reply other threads:[~2001-12-06 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-06 16:07 Greg Hennessy [this message]
2001-12-06 16:17 ` horrible disk thorughput on itanium Arjan van de Ven
2001-12-06 20:47 ` Andrew Morton
2001-12-09 23:13 ` Kurt Garloff
[not found] <20011206110713.A8404@cox.rr.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3C0FD955.4510B738@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-12-06 22:13 ` Andi Kleen
2001-12-07 6:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-12-07 6:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-12-07 12:32 ` Greg Hennessy
2001-12-07 17:57 ` Marco Colombo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-07 6:42 Dan Kegel
[not found] <p73r8q86lpn.fsf@amdsim2.suse.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112070710120.747-100000@mikeg.weiden.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <9upmqm$7p4$1@penguin.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-12-07 13:54 ` Andi Kleen
2001-12-07 14:20 ` Padraig Brady
2001-12-07 16:14 ` Richard Gooch
2001-12-07 17:18 ` Robert Love
2001-12-07 17:40 ` Richard Gooch
2001-12-07 17:48 ` Robert Love
2001-12-07 17:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-12-07 17:58 ` Andi Kleen
2001-12-07 18:14 ` Michael Poole
2001-12-07 18:35 ` Padraig Brady
2001-12-07 21:22 ` Michael Poole
2001-12-07 21:37 ` Padraig Brady
2001-12-07 22:26 ` Michael Poole
2001-12-07 18:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-12-07 18:41 ` Padraig Brady
2001-12-07 18:33 ` Padraig Brady
2001-12-07 20:44 ` Greg Hennessy
2001-12-07 21:37 ` Marco Colombo
2001-12-07 20:42 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011206110713.A8404@cox.rr.com \
--to=gsh@cox.rr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.