From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id fB6Ivb626767 for linux-mips-outgoing; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:57:37 -0800 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fB6IvXo26764 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:57:33 -0800 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id fB6HvOV11234; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:57:24 -0200 Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:57:24 -0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "H . J . Lu" Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Why is byteorder removed from /proc/cpuinfo? Message-ID: <20011206155724.A11083@dea.linux-mips.net> References: <20011206093506.A6496@lucon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011206093506.A6496@lucon.org>; from hjl@lucon.org on Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 09:35:06AM -0800 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 09:35:06AM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote: > The byteorder field is emoved from /proc/cpuinfo in the current 2.4 > kernel in CVS. It breaks config.guess used by all the GNU softwares. Grrr... In the past config.guess used gcc to compile a test program using gcc. I told sometime ago to whoever it was that I'm going to remove all non-cpu related information (endianess should be considered per _thread_ on MIPS!) from /proc/cpuinfo where it has no business; the /proc rewrite in 2.4.15 more or less forced me into this. Ralf