From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id fB7FU5R10905 for linux-mips-outgoing; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 07:30:05 -0800 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fB7FU0o10893 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 07:30:01 -0800 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id fB72Vh801337; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 00:31:43 -0200 Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 00:31:43 -0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Ian Chilton Cc: Florian Lohoff , linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: 2.4.16 success on Indy (was Re: 2.4.16 success on Decstation 5000/150) Message-ID: <20011207003143.E1202@dea.linux-mips.net> References: <20011203161921.B30391@woody.ichilton.co.uk> <20011203192543.A10394@paradigm.rfc822.org> <20011203224401.A31747@woody.ichilton.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011203224401.A31747@woody.ichilton.co.uk>; from ian@ichilton.co.uk on Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 10:44:01PM +0000 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 10:44:01PM +0000, Ian Chilton wrote: > > Immediatly afterwards the massive ammount of IRQs. With 100Hz and 160 > > Chars across the screen - I would expect 1-2 lines/s on the screen. > > Instead the screen fills up within tens of seconds which seems to me > > like non acked IRQ. > > Weird.. > > Has any changes been made to the IRQ code lately? There indeed were and the guilty person already sent me a few fixes which I haven't applied yet. Ralf