All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@microdata-pos.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: xchg and GCC's optimisation:-(
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:45:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011217134526.A31801@microdata-pos.de> (raw)

Hi!

I recently posted a patch against 2.2.19 which eliminates most
printk()s by (in short words):

#define printk(format, arg...) do {} while(0)

However, I got trouble using the floppy driver, because
./kernel/dma.c:free_dma() seems to get miscompiled:

void free_dma(unsigned int dmanr)
{
        if (dmanr >= MAX_DMA_CHANNELS) {
                printk("Trying to free DMA%d\n", dmanr);
                return;
        }

        if (xchg(&dma_chan_busy[dmanr].lock, 0) == 0) {
/* ERROR */     printk("Trying to free free DMA%d\n", dmanr);
                return;
        }

} /* free_dma */

Including a real_printk() at the line marked with ERROR will
result in:
00000088 <free_dma>:
  88:   83 ec 0c                sub    $0xc,%esp
  8b:   8b 54 24 10             mov    0x10(%esp,1),%edx
  8f:   83 fa 07                cmp    $0x7,%edx
  92:   77 1e                   ja     b2 <free_dma+0x2a>
  94:   31 c0                   xor    %eax,%eax
  96:   87 04 d5 00 00 00 00    xchg   %eax,0x0(,%edx,8)
  9d:   85 c0                   test   %eax,%eax
  9f:   75 11                   jne    b2 <free_dma+0x2a>
  a1:   83 c4 f8                add    $0xfffffff8,%esp
  a4:   52                      push   %edx
  a5:   68 11 00 00 00          push   $0x11
  aa:   e8 fc ff ff ff          call   ab <free_dma+0x23>
  af:   83 c4 10                add    $0x10,%esp
  b2:   83 c4 0c                add    $0xc,%esp
  b5:   c3                      ret
  b6:   8d 76 00                lea    0x0(%esi),%esi
  b9:   8d bc 27 00 00 00 00    lea    0x0(%edi,1),%edi

...which is fine and contains the needed xchg call. However,
substituting the printk() with "do {} while (0)" above,
the "if" path seems to be completely removed by the optimizer:

00000088 <free_dma>:
  88:   c3                      ret    
  89:   8d b4 26 00 00 00 00    lea    0x0(%esi,1),%esi


I've looked at ./include/asm-i386/system.h which does some black
magic with it, and I don't really understand that. However, the
result is that the xchg gets optimized away, rendering at least
the floppy module unuseable:-(

MfG, JBG


             reply	other threads:[~2001-12-17 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-17 12:45 Jan-Benedict Glaw [this message]
2001-12-17 13:18 ` xchg and GCC's optimisation:-( Momchil Velikov
2001-12-17 13:55   ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2001-12-17 17:33 ` vda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011217134526.A31801@microdata-pos.de \
    --to=jbglaw@microdata-pos.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.