From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: GCS <gcs@lsc.hu>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] 2.4.17rc2
Message-Id: <20011221084531.A22947@lsc.hu>
References: <20011221022542.GH15643@auctionwatch.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20011221022542.GH15643@auctionwatch.com>; from
    petro@auctionwatch.com on Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 06:25:42PM -0800
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@sistina.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/>
Date: Fri Dec 21 01:51:01 2001
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com

On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 06:25:42PM -0800, Petro <petro@auctionwatch.com> wrote:
> Did a bunch of stuff get updated in the 2.4.17rc2 kernel? I ask because
> I just applied that patch to 2.4.16, and at one point patch stated it
> looked like a patch had already been applied. 
 Sure, 2.4.17 contains a lot of little fixes over 2.4.16. I think it may be
safe to skip that part. Anyway, what file is reported to be already applied?
Cheers, GCS