From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
SteveW@ACM.org, jschlst@samba.org, ncorbic@sangoma.com,
eis@baty.hanse.de, dag@brattli.net, torvalds@transmeta.com,
marcelo@conectiva.com.br, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][RFC 4] cleaning up struct sock
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 01:28:24 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011222012824.A8996@conectiva.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011218.130809.22018359.davem@redhat.com> <20011218232222.A1963@conectiva.com.br> <20011220012339.A919@conectiva.com.br> <20011220.002126.119272610.davem@redhat.com> <20011221115438.A5990@conectiva.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <20011221115438.A5990@conectiva.com.br>
Em Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:54:38AM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:21:26AM -0800, David S. Miller escreveu:
> > I'd rather you pass the "kmem_cache_t" directly into sk_alloc, use
> > NULL for "I don't have any extra private area".
> >
> > And then, for the IP case lay it out like this:
> >
> > struct sock
> > struct ip_opt
> > struct {tcp,raw4,...}_opt
> >
> > And use different kmem_cache_t's for each protocol instead of
> > the same one for tcp, raw4, etc.
> >
> > RAW/UDP sockets waste a lot of space with your current layout.
Done, patch available at:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/acme/v2.5/2.5.2-pre1/
sock.cleanup-2.5.2-pre1.bz2
Current state of /proc/slabinfo:
[acme@rama2 acme]$ grep sock /proc/slabinfo
unix_sock 7 20 400 1 2 1 : 17 572 2 0 0
raw4_sock 0 10 376 0 1 1 : 1 3 1 0 0
udp_sock 6 10 372 1 1 1 : 7 31 1 0 0
tcp_sock 13 15 800 3 3 1 : 14 47 3 0 0
sock 0 0 336 0 0 1 : 0 0 0 0 0
TODO: do the same for IPv6, that now has only one slabcache for all its
protocols.
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-22 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20011210230810.C896@conectiva.com.br>
[not found] ` <20011210.231826.55509210.davem@redhat.com>
2001-12-18 5:35 ` [PATCH][RFC 2] cleaning up struct sock Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
[not found] ` <20011217.225134.91313099.davem@redhat.com>
2001-12-18 12:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-12-18 20:52 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-12-18 21:08 ` David S. Miller
[not found] ` <20011218232222.A1963@conectiva.com.br>
2001-12-20 3:23 ` [PATCH][RFC 3] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-12-20 8:21 ` David S. Miller
2001-12-20 12:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-12-21 13:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-12-22 3:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011222012824.A8996@conectiva.com.br \
--to=acme@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=SteveW@ACM.org \
--cc=dag@brattli.net \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=eis@baty.hanse.de \
--cc=jschlst@samba.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=ncorbic@sangoma.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.