From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id fBR5VAe03837 for linux-mips-outgoing; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 21:31:10 -0800 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fBR5UwX03831 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 21:31:01 -0800 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id fBR4Tab19425; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 02:29:36 -0200 Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 02:29:36 -0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Atsushi Nemoto Cc: dony.he@huawei.com, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: vmalloc bugs in 2.4.5??? Message-ID: <20011227022936.A19397@dea.linux-mips.net> References: <20011226013221.A737@dea.linux-mips.net> <20011227.105518.74756316.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <20011227011222.A16695@dea.linux-mips.net> <20011227.125122.71082554.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011227.125122.71082554.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>; from nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp on Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:51:22PM +0900 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:51:22PM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 01:12:22 -0200, Ralf Baechle said: > ralf> Yes, you're right as for the cache. But there is no reason for > ralf> the TLB flush, right? > > Yes, I agree. Ok, I'll make a patch for Marcelo. Being in Brazil right now is useful, I can beat him into accepting it ;-) Ralf