From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id fBUMPZT20804 for linux-mips-outgoing; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 14:25:35 -0800 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id fBUMPWg20801 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 14:25:32 -0800 Received: from uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id QAA02744 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 16:14:27 -0800 (PST) mail_from (ralf@linux-mips.net) Received: from eddie (root@eddie.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.4.17]) by uni-koblenz.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA22818 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 01:09:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from dea.linux-mips.net by eddie (SMI-8.6/KO-2.0) id BAA18884; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 01:09:23 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id fBRLrYp01753; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 19:53:34 -0200 Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 19:53:34 -0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Carsten Langgaard Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Signals Message-ID: <20011227195334.C1553@dea.linux-mips.net> References: <3C2B0093.3AFC80A9@mips.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3C2B0093.3AFC80A9@mips.com>; from carstenl@mips.com on Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:05:55PM +0100 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:05:55PM +0100, Carsten Langgaard wrote: > Why is the signals definition (in include/asm-mips/signal.h) for MIPS > different from everybody else ? > For example: > > Hdefine SIGBUS 10 (MIPS) > Hdefine SIGBUS 7 (I386) > > Hdefine SIGSTKFLT 16 (I386, doesn't exist on MIPS) > > Is there any reason for this ? Time to read the ABI :-) Ralf