From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: timothy.covell@ashavan.org
Cc: "Davide Libenzi" <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
"Dieter Nützel" <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>,
"Robert Love" <rml@tech9.net>,
"Linux Kernel List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Balanced Multi Queue Scheduler ...
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 00:16:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200112302316.AAA10906@webserver.ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200112301951.fBUJoxSr011753@svr3.applink.net>
> On Saturday 29 December 2001 17:38, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> [Offtopic seti hints :-) ]
> Ummm, on my Dual P-III (650MHz with 524988416 Bytes), my current
Seti
> efficiency is 5.35 CpF. That's a tad high/slower than an Ultra
Sparc IIi
> according to their stats. So, it would appear that being SMP is
hurting my
> performance a bit. Unless that is that you meant to run a seti
instance for
> each CPU?
Yes, exactly, use one seti per cpu and you will be happy :-)
As far as I know they intended it this way.
Regards,
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-30 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-29 5:16 [PATCH] Balanced Multi Queue Scheduler Dieter Nützel
2001-12-29 22:29 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-29 22:49 ` Andrew Morton
2001-12-29 23:39 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-29 23:38 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-12-30 0:02 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-30 2:32 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-30 3:11 ` Dieter Nützel
2001-12-30 19:47 ` Timothy Covell
2001-12-30 20:16 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-30 23:20 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-12-30 23:46 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-31 16:37 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-12-31 17:26 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-30 20:47 ` J Sloan
2001-12-30 20:53 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-30 21:12 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-30 23:16 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2002-01-14 1:33 ` Bill Davidsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-29 3:53 Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200112302316.AAA10906@webserver.ithnet.com \
--to=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=timothy.covell@ashavan.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.