Re: ramdisk corruption problems - was: RE: pivot_root and initrd kern el panic woes

[Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>]

On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 10:38:14PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Alexander Viro wrote:
> > 
> > On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > > Would it be necessary to preallocate the holes at mmap() time?  Mad
> > > hand-waving: Could we not perform the instantiation at pagefault time,
> > > and give the caller SIGBUS if we cannot allocate the blocks?  Or if
> > > there's an IO error, or quota exceeded.
> > 
> > Allocation at mmap() Is Not Going To Happen.  Consider it vetoed.
> > There are applications that use mmap() on large and very sparse
> > files.
> 
> I think Andrea was referring to simply reserving the necessary
> amount of disk space, rather than actually instantiating the
> blocks.  But even that would be a big problem for the applications

correct.

> which you describe.

Nod.

> 
> > > Question: can someone please define BH_New?  Its lifecycle seems
> > > very vague.  We never actually seem to *clear* it anywhere for
> > > ext2, and it appears that the kernel will keep on treating a
> > > clearly non-new buffer as "new" all the time.  ext3 explicitly
> > > clears BH_New in get_block(), if it finds the block was already
> > > present in the file.  I did this because we need the newness
> > > info for internal purposes.
> > 
> > It should be reset when we submit IO.
> 
> well...  It isn't.  And I'd like a chance to review/test any

see the other email, it's all right as far I can tell, it doesn't need
to be resetted ever. only mapped bh are bh_new so you will never care
about bh_new any longer because you will never need any further
get_block on the same bh.


> proposed changes in this area which are outside specific filesystems...
> 
> > Breakage related to failing allocation is indeed not new, but
> > that's a long story.  And no, "allocate on mmap()" is not a fix.
> 
> Yup.  But what *is* the fix?  (filemap_nopage?)
> 
> -


Andrea