From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: harald.holzer@eunet.at, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
wookie@osdl.org, velco@fadata.bg
Subject: Re: i686 SMP systems with more then 12 GB ram with 2.4.x kernel ?
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:33:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020103153355.612bd269.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201031106590.24031-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1010015450.15492.19.camel@hh2.hhhome.at> <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201031106590.24031-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:28:45 -0200 (BRST)
Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> wrote:
> Another item to look into is removing the page cache hash table
> and replacing it by a radix tree or hash trie, in the hopes of
> improving scalability while at the same time saving some space.
Ah, didn't we see such a patch lately in LKML? If I remember correct I saw some
comparison charts too and some people testing it were happy with it. Just
searched through the list: 24. dec :-) by Momchil Velikov Can someone with big
mem have a look at the saving? How about 18-pre?
Regards,
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-03 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-29 18:18 i686 SMP systems with more then 12 GB ram with 2.4.x kernel ? Harald Holzer
2001-12-29 18:45 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-29 21:24 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2001-12-30 0:25 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2001-12-30 2:14 ` Harald Holzer
2001-12-30 2:33 ` M. Edward Borasky
2002-01-01 18:15 ` M. Edward Borasky
2002-01-01 18:46 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-01 19:02 ` M. Edward Borasky
2002-01-02 1:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-02 21:17 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-01-06 8:20 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-01-06 16:16 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-06 20:23 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-01-06 23:37 ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-01-07 0:29 ` The COUGAR Project M. Edward Borasky
2002-01-07 2:18 ` i686 SMP systems with more then 12 GB ram with 2.4.x kernel ? Marvin Justice
2002-01-07 2:38 ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-01-07 4:40 ` T. A.
2002-01-07 16:20 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-01-02 17:30 ` Timothy D. Witham
[not found] ` <1009994687.12942.14.camel@hh2.hhhome.at>
[not found] ` <1009995669.1253.17.camel@wookie-laptop.pdx.osdl.net>
2002-01-02 23:50 ` Harald Holzer
2002-01-03 0:16 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-03 13:30 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-04 12:09 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-01-04 12:15 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-03 0:17 ` Mark Zealey
2002-01-03 13:28 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-03 14:33 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2002-01-03 16:38 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-03 15:15 ` Anton Blanchard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-29 19:25 Dieter Nützel
2002-01-06 18:39 Daniel Freedman
2002-01-06 18:59 ` Marvin Justice
2002-01-06 19:45 ` Daniel Freedman
2002-01-06 20:15 ` Marvin Justice
2002-01-07 5:17 ` Daniel Freedman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020103153355.612bd269.skraw@ithnet.com \
--to=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=harald.holzer@eunet.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=velco@fadata.bg \
--cc=wookie@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.