All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: __FUNCTION__ - patch for USB
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 14:26:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020109222657.GA23143@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C3CC04D.2080807@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C3CC04D.2080807@intel.com>

On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:12:29AM +0200, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote:
> Hello,
> Since I have started this thread, I feel I have to do something real. 
> Dummy technical work, but someone have to do it, right?
> I patched USB subsystem, it uses __FUNCTION__ in deprecated way no more.
> What is changed?
> - in usb.h, I modified dbg(), warn(), err(), info() macros to contain 
> function name in the prefix. These macros are for simple one-line messages.
> - in all files under drivers/usb, all macros mentioned fixed.
> - all __FUNCTION__ occurencies in drivers/usb revised.
> 
> I compiled kednel with all USB modules enabled. Since everything 
> compiles OK and all changes are in message formats, this patch should 
> not corrupt anything. In the worst case you will get badly formatted 
> message.

Your patch makes whitespace changes to a lot of dbg() statements, but
does not modify their contents.  Can you please change this, as this
change does not need to happen.

> Patch is against 2.4.17

2.4.18-pre2 has a _lot_ of usb changes and this patch misses a number of
places.

I'd also like to see this against the 2.5.x tree first, as the
recommended compiler for the 2.4.x tree is still 2.95.3, and I don't
think that will change anytime soon.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2002-01-09 22:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-09 22:12 __FUNCTION__ - patch for USB Vladimir Kondratiev
2002-01-09 22:26 ` Greg KH [this message]
2002-01-10 10:52   ` Vladimir Kondratiev
2002-01-10 16:09     ` Greg KH
2002-01-11 12:23       ` Vladimir Kondratiev
2002-01-10  9:08 ` Nick Craig-Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020109222657.GA23143@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vladimir.kondratiev@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.