From: florin@iucha.net (Florin Iucha)
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.4.18-pre3-ac2 performance regression(?) vs. 2.4.17
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:53:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020115025337.GC1226@iucha.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1398 bytes --]
Rik, Alan,
I have downloaded 2.4.18-pre3-ac2 out of curiosity for the VM and IDE
performance.
As a "benchmark" I ran hdparm -Tt /dev/hda. The results were surprising:
2.4.17
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.86 seconds =148.84 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 3.95 seconds = 16.20 MB/sec
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.90 seconds =142.22 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 4.05 seconds = 15.80 MB/sec
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.88 seconds =145.45 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 4.00 seconds = 16.00 MB/sec
2.4.18-pre3-ac2
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.99 seconds =129.29 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 3.90 seconds = 16.41 MB/sec
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.93 seconds =137.63 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 4.03 seconds = 15.88 MB/sec
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.92 seconds =139.13 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 3.90 seconds = 16.41 MB/sec
So while I see a slight (un)expected improvement in IDE performance, I
also see a degradation in memory? performance.
The box is a PIII/700MHz laptop with 256 Mb RAM. hdparm is version 4.5
Cheers,
florin
--
"If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is."
41A9 2BDE 8E11 F1C5 87A6 03EE 34B3 E075 3B90 DFE4
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2002-01-15 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020115025337.GC1226@iucha.net \
--to=florin@iucha.net \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.