From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id g0FLxLG04901 for linux-mips-outgoing; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 13:59:21 -0800 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g0FLxJP04898 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 13:59:19 -0800 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id g0FKxHD01997; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:59:17 -0800 Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:59:17 -0800 From: Ralf Baechle To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: MIPS64 status? Message-ID: <20020115125917.B1832@dea.linux-mips.net> References: <20020114150751.B29242@dea.linux-mips.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jgg@debian.org on Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:08:24PM -0700 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:08:24PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Could someone quickly comment on how it is running? Can it boot normal 32 > bit user space OK? I know with sparc64 there were (are?) a number of > problems with missing 32 bit syscall translations for some obscure > things.. Same situation for mips64. Ralf