From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: wilson@whack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hires timestamps for netif_rx()
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:17:59 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020116.161759.68040363.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.40.0201161514030.5375-100000@apogee.whack.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020116180042.A21447@willow.seitz.com> <Pine.GSO.4.40.0201161514030.5375-100000@apogee.whack.org>
From: Wilson Yeung <wilson@whack.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:33:04 -0800 (PST)
I'd love to have a run-time tuneable kernel parameter that lets me use
do_gettimeofday() instead of get_fast_time for received packet
timestamping. Does this seem reasonable?
Can you demonstrate a difference in accurace between these two
routines on any architecture :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-17 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-16 19:56 CML2-2.1.4 is available Eric S. Raymond
2002-01-16 22:50 ` Ross Vandegrift
2002-01-16 22:43 ` Eric S. Raymond
2002-01-16 23:00 ` Ross Vandegrift
2002-01-16 23:01 ` Eric S. Raymond
2002-01-17 1:02 ` Ross Vandegrift
2002-01-17 1:51 ` [kbuild-devel] " Eric S. Raymond
2002-01-17 4:32 ` Eric S. Raymond
2002-01-16 23:33 ` hires timestamps for netif_rx() Wilson Yeung
2002-01-17 0:17 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-01-17 1:03 ` Wilson Yeung
2002-01-17 1:08 ` David S. Miller
2002-01-17 2:45 ` Wilson Yeung
2002-01-17 5:12 ` David S. Miller
2002-01-17 5:48 ` CM8338 hissing sound with linux kernel 2.4.6 to 2.4.17 vernie
2002-01-17 20:54 ` Thomas Cataldo
2002-01-17 19:15 ` hires timestamps for netif_rx() bill davidsen
2002-01-17 1:23 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020116.161759.68040363.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wilson@whack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.