Return-Path: Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [10.10.96.4]) by Wotan.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE0985060 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:36:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by Hermes.suse.de (Postfix) id 0F9B15D83F; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:36:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from Cantor.suse.de (ns.suse.de [213.95.15.193]) by Hermes.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84CC5D62A; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:36:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [199.183.24.194]) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB80A1E7B2; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:36:08 +0100 (MET) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 08:31:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 08:31:12 -0500 Received: from smtpde02.sap-ag.de ([194.39.131.53]:53983 "EHLO smtpde02.sap-ag.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 08:31:01 -0500 Received: from sap-ag.de (smtpde02) by smtpde02.sap-ag.de (out) with ESMTP id OAA28930; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:33:55 +0100 (MEZ) Message-ID: <816D93CCC927D31188570008C75D1DE106DEA661@dbwdfx1a.wdf.sap-ag.de> From: "Nuesser, Wilhelm" To: "'arjanv@redhat.com'" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: Performance tests 2.4.7 SuSE / Red Hat vs. 2.4.14 (pre8) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 14:30:52 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SAP: out Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Arjan van de Ven [mailto:arjanv@redhat.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 13. November 2001 14:23 > To: Nuesser, Wilhelm > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: Performance tests 2.4.7 SuSE / Red Hat vs. 2.4.14 (pre8) > > > > > 4) Our conclusion: > > > > Although we still see some problems with the 2.4.14 based kernel it > > looks really promising for us. A _stable_ increase of a factor of > > 10 in memory critical situations is impressive. Especially since our > > customer tend to steer every system finally into this load > region ;-) > > Could you please also test the 2.4.9 RH kernel ? > We did this, you know ... The results were comparable to the 2.4.7 results, at least for the kernels 2.4.9-[1,6]enterprise. Best regards Willi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/