From: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
feedback@suse.de
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Boot failure: msdos pushes in front of reiserfs
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:38:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020117093839.A20206@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020113223803.GA28085@emma1.emma.line.org> <20020114095013.A4760@namesys.com> <20020114140021.GD5711@emma1.emma.line.org> <20020114173030.A1901@namesys.com> <20020115174712.GB3182@emma1.emma.line.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020115174712.GB3182@emma1.emma.line.org>
Hello!
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 06:47:12PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > Looking at init/main.c and fs/super.c, rootfsflags parameter is never
> > saved, moreover - it's original value is destroyed, once initrd fs is
> > mounted. And I only see not very nice ways of fixing this, so perhaps
> > someone more exeprienced can come up with the solution? (my crappy
> > ides is not to do putname() on fs_names, if (real_root_dev !=
> > ROOT_DEV), all of this is only when CONFIG_..._INITRD enabled)
> Thanks for confirming a bug, so I understand that mounting an initrd
> loses the rootfsflags, and as the actual root= parameter is kept over an
> initrd boot, it should also be possible for rootfsflags= -- can the
> rootfsflags maybe be saved along with the root= parameter?
No. rootfsflags is saved. What is not saved is rootfstype. And yes, it can be saved, of course.
> > > Yup, reiserfs is last in /proc/filesystems when loaded as module, but on
> > > my private machine (where it's linked into the kernel), it's right after
> > > ext2 and before vfat.
> > Do you have vfat as a loadable module?
> Hum, yes, but that's not the point, someone turned up with a SuSE 7.3
This is the point in fact. If you'd have both reiserfs and vfat compiled-in,
you'd see that vfat ebfore reiserfs in /proc/filesystems.
Bye,
Oleg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-17 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-13 22:38 Boot failure: msdos pushes in front of reiserfs Matthias Andree
2002-01-14 6:50 ` [reiserfs-list] " Oleg Drokin
2002-01-14 11:16 ` Hans Reiser
2002-01-14 11:36 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-01-14 17:42 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-01-14 19:46 ` Hans Reiser
2002-01-14 20:21 ` Andrew Clausen
2002-01-14 20:21 ` Chris Mason
2002-01-14 20:29 ` Andrew Clausen
2002-01-14 14:00 ` Matthias Andree
2002-01-14 14:30 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-01-15 17:47 ` Matthias Andree
2002-01-17 6:38 ` Oleg Drokin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020117093839.A20206@namesys.com \
--to=green@namesys.com \
--cc=feedback@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.