From: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se>,
rwhron@earthlink.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.18pre4aa1
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 18:29:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020125182901.J28068@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020125061801.W1735@khan.acc.umu.se> <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201251502230.32617-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201251502230.32617-100000@imladris.surriel.com>; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:03:16PM -0200
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:03:16PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> The -aa kernel seems to contain patches to a few dozen subsystems.
> The -rmap patch is pretty much only VM changes.
> You're right that this is not a strict VM vs VM comparison...
Agreed. Andrea's tree seemed to gain quite a bit of a lead
when bits of the lowlat patches were applied for eg.
Just taking 00_vm_?? from ../people/andrea/.. would give better
comparison for a head to head vm pissing contest.
--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-25 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-24 5:23 2.4.18pre4aa1 rwhron
2002-01-24 6:27 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Daniel Phillips
2002-01-25 0:09 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-28 9:53 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Daniel Phillips
2002-01-28 15:29 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-28 20:28 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Daniel Phillips
2002-01-28 23:40 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-29 0:15 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Daniel Phillips
2002-01-29 13:05 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Pavel Machek
2002-01-25 0:19 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 rwhron
2002-01-25 0:29 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Rik van Riel
2002-01-25 3:23 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 rwhron
2002-01-25 3:35 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Rik van Riel
2002-01-25 4:56 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 rwhron
2002-01-25 4:57 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Rik van Riel
2002-01-25 5:18 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 David Weinehall
2002-01-25 17:03 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Rik van Riel
2002-01-25 17:29 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2002-01-25 12:26 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Dave Jones
2002-01-25 14:57 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 rwhron
2002-01-28 0:37 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-25 0:11 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-22 6:48 2.4.18pre4aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-22 6:58 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Robert Love
2002-01-22 7:37 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Dan Chen
2002-01-22 7:43 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Robert Love
2002-01-22 10:02 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Russell King
2002-01-22 10:12 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020125182901.J28068@suse.de \
--to=davej@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=rwhron@earthlink.net \
--cc=tao@acc.umu.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.