From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id g122lkf26148 for linux-mips-outgoing; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 18:47:46 -0800 Received: from ocean.lucon.org (12-234-19-19.client.attbi.com [12.234.19.19]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id g122lgd26145; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 18:47:42 -0800 Received: by ocean.lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9AFCC125C3; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 17:47:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 17:47:38 -0800 From: "H . J . Lu" To: Matthew Dharm Cc: Ralf Baechle , Carsten Langgaard , linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: fsck fails on latest 2.4 kernel Message-ID: <20020201174738.A18322@lucon.org> References: <20020201145244.B15521@lucon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from mdharm@momenco.com on Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:08:57PM -0800 Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:08:57PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote: > As an aside, it looks like you can't rebuild this from source without > gettext installed, but that isn't a pre-req given in the spec file. > > It looks like there is code to detect gettext and substitute a local > copy if it's not available, but that code doesn't seem to work right. > There are many things left out, like gcc, binutils, glibc-devel, ..... I don't like to list all of them. It should be no different to bootstrap gcc. H.J.