From: Johannes Erdfelt <johannes@erdfelt.com>
To: Pozsar Balazs <pozsy@sch.bme.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: uhci vs. usb-uhci: which is better?
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:03:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020202140313.P11223@sventech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0202021933360.2459-100000@balu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0202021933360.2459-100000@balu>; from pozsy@sch.bme.hu on Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 07:37:24PM +0100
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002, Pozsar Balazs <pozsy@sch.bme.hu> wrote:
> What is the difference between the usb-uhci and the uhci modules?
> Are there any cases where only one suitable?
>
> In short: which is 'better'?
The better one is probably the one that works for you.
JE
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-02 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-02 18:37 uhci vs. usb-uhci: which is better? Pozsar Balazs
2002-02-02 19:03 ` Johannes Erdfelt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020202140313.P11223@sventech.com \
--to=johannes@erdfelt.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pozsy@sch.bme.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.