From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel: ldt allocation failed
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 19:12:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020206191233.I21624@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020206163118.E21624@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <E16YcJW-0006vG-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E16YcJW-0006vG-00@the-village.bc.nu>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 12:21:22AM +0000
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 12:21:22AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > This is not possible, since then %gs:0 (which is TLS base) cannot be read.
> > We would have to change the TLS ABI (thus become incompatible e.g. with Sun)
>
> Sun who have canned their x86 product it seems. I don't feel "the standard
> requires we suck" is an appropriate justification for anything. If there
> is not a sane way to follow the standard - break it. If there is a sane way
> then all fair and good, find it and use it
We have changed it already (e.g,. for regparm(1), fewer relocs, shorter insn
sequences, etc.), but with exception of 2 non-dynamic relocs (which get
different numbers) we are still compatible.
But as written later, just using a different GDT descriptor could avoid
having to change the ABI, but would still have the undesirable property of
requiring every app to mmap a new page at fixed location.
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-07 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.21.0112070057480.20196-100000@tombigbee.pixar.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <5.1.0.14.2.20011207092244.049f6720@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <200202061258.g16CwGt31197@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-02-06 13:19 ` kernel: ldt allocation failed Andi Kleen
2002-02-06 14:06 ` Dave Jones
2002-02-06 14:13 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-06 14:09 ` Andi Kleen
2002-02-06 14:39 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-06 16:37 ` bert hubert
2002-02-06 15:51 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-02-06 16:08 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-06 16:29 ` John Levon
2002-02-06 18:01 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-06 18:02 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-02-06 15:12 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-02-06 18:11 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-02-06 20:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-06 21:15 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-02-06 21:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-06 20:21 ` yodaiken
2002-02-06 21:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-06 21:31 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-02-06 22:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-06 22:20 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-02-06 23:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-07 0:21 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-07 0:12 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2002-02-07 0:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-07 0:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-06 15:37 ` Alan Cox
[not found] <fa.kit1f7v.j024op@ifi.uio.no>
2001-12-07 7:24 ` Dan Maas
2001-12-07 9:00 ` Kiril Vidimce
2001-12-07 9:15 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-07 9:13 ` Kiril Vidimce
2001-12-07 9:28 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-07 9:26 ` James Davies
2001-12-07 9:43 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-07 13:10 ` James Davies
2001-12-07 13:41 ` Dave Jones
2001-12-07 13:59 ` James Davies
2001-12-07 13:53 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-07 9:45 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-12-07 10:38 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-06 16:58 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-02-06 13:42 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-06 17:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-12-07 10:12 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-12-07 5:40 Kiril Vidimce
2001-12-07 5:58 ` Jeffrey H. Ingber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020206191233.I21624@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.