From: Val Henson <val@nmt.edu>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: [PATCH] adjust BAT mapping according to max_low_mem
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 13:36:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020208133604.H25005@boardwalk> (raw)
I'm testing highmem by setting max_low_mem to 64MB and using 256MB RAM
total (this does not trigger my SCSI bug). I had to change a few
things in adjust_total_lowmem to force it to _not_ BAT map of all the
RAM. I think the printout of residual is wrong but I'm not sure.
-VAL
# This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project:
# Project Name: Linux 2.4 for PowerPC development tree
# This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher.
# This patch includes the following deltas:
# ChangeSet 1.201 -> 1.202
# arch/ppc/mm/pgtable.c 1.15 -> 1.16
#
# The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
# --------------------------------------------
# 02/02/08 val@evilcat.fsmlabs.com 1.202
# Fix bat calculations to take into account max_low_mem. This maps only the
# max_low_mem RAM with BATs, so you can test the highmem code on machines with
# less ram. The printout of "residual" is probably wrong, since it now only
# lists the residual lowmem, rather than all residual mem.
# --------------------------------------------
#
diff -Nru a/arch/ppc/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/ppc/mm/pgtable.c
--- a/arch/ppc/mm/pgtable.c Fri Feb 8 13:29:29 2002
+++ b/arch/ppc/mm/pgtable.c Fri Feb 8 13:29:29 2002
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
#ifdef HAVE_BATS
unsigned long bat_max = 0x10000000;
unsigned long align;
- unsigned long ram = total_lowmem;
+ unsigned long ram;
int is601 = 0;
/* 601s have smaller BATs */
@@ -213,6 +213,16 @@
bat_max = 0x00800000;
is601 = 1;
}
+
+ /* adjust BAT block size to max_low_mem */
+ if (max_low_mem < bat_max)
+ bat_max = max_low_mem;
+
+ /* adjust lowmem size to max_low_mem */
+ if (max_low_mem < total_lowmem)
+ total_lowmem = max_low_mem;
+
+ ram = total_lowmem;
/* Make sure we don't map a block larger than the
smallest alignment of the physical address. */
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2002-02-08 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-08 20:36 Val Henson [this message]
2002-02-09 20:47 ` [PATCH] adjust BAT mapping according to max_low_mem Tom Rini
2002-02-09 21:20 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020208133604.H25005@boardwalk \
--to=val@nmt.edu \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.