From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Wingo Subject: Re: Status of ALSA documentation? Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:23:14 -0500 Message-ID: <20020215202313.GG13853@jesus> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Kevin Conder wrote: > > Finally, if you're going to turn everything over to the Wikki > kiddies then count me out! I believe in quality over quantity. > having written my share of documents, it's not the format that matters; one format can be converted mechanically to another. it's the text. rant all you want about how one format is better than another; but you've demonstrated it best yourself, converting mark rage's document from the wiki to docbook was easier than writing something yourself. this is why writing docs is non-trivial. regards, wingo. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel