All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: "Peter Wong" <wpeter@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
	marcelo@conectiva.com.br, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Encountered a Null Pointer Problem on the SCSI Layer
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:01:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200202182301.AAA23425@webserver.ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFC7A42817.7DD2C3FB-ON85256B64.00725D00@raleigh.ibm.com>

> A while ago, I reported that I encountered a null pointer problem   
> on the SCSI layer when I was testing Mingming Cao's diskio patch    
> "diskio-stat-rq-2414" on 2.4.14.                                    
>                                                                     
> Mingming's patch is at http://sourceforge.net/projects/lse/.        
>                                                                     
> The code in sd_find_queue() that protects against accessing a       
> non-existent device is not correct. After my patch was sent out,    
> Pete Zaitcev of Red Hat identified a similar problem in             
> sd_init_command of the same file.                                   
>                                                                     
>      Let's consider sd_find_queue().                                
>                                                                     
>      If the array pointed by rscsi_disk has been allocated,         
> dpnt cannot be null.                                                
>                                                                     
>      If rscsi_disk has NOT been allocated, dpnt =                   
&rscsi_disks[target]                                                  
> may NOT be null, and it depends on the value of target. Thus,       
> "if (!dpnt)" is not sufficient anyway.                              
>                                                                     
>      You can also look at sd_attach(), in which "if (!dpnt->device)"
is                                                                    
> tested, not "if (!dpnt)".                                           
>                                                                     
>      Please check.                                                  
                                                                      
Are you 100% sure, that there is no case where                        
dpnt==NULL? Because if there is such a possibility, your patch will   
blow up.                                                              
It would be completely safe to check both                             
                                                                      
(!dpnt && !dpnt->device)                                              
                                                                      
Regards,                                                              
Stephan                                                               
                                                                      
                                                                      
>                                                                     
> The following patch is based on the 2.4.18-pre7 code:               
>                                                                     
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----                                                                 
> --- linux/drivers/scsi/sd.c   Mon Feb 18 13:36:42 2002              
> +++ linux-2.4.17-diskio/drivers/scsi/sd.c Mon Feb 18 13:29:34 2002  
> @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@                                                 
>       target = DEVICE_NR(dev);                                      
>                                                                     
>       dpnt = &rscsi_disks[target];                                  
> -     if (!dpnt)                                                    
> +     if (!dpnt->device)                                            
>             return NULL;      /* No such device */                  
>       return &dpnt->device->request_queue;                          
>  }                                                                  
> @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@                                                 
>                                                                     
>       dpnt = &rscsi_disks[dev];                                     
>       if (devm >= (sd_template.dev_max << 4) ||                     
> -         !dpnt ||                                                  
> +         !dpnt->device ||                                          
>           !dpnt->device->online ||                                  
>           block + SCpnt->request.nr_sectors > sd[devm].nr_sects) {  
>             SCSI_LOG_HLQUEUE(2, printk("Finishing %ld sectors\n",   
SCpnt->request.nr_sectors));                                          
>                                                                     
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----                                                                 
>                                                                     
> Regards,                                                            
> Peter                                                               
>                                                                     
> Wai Yee Peter Wong                                                  
> IBM Linux Technology Center, Performance Analysis                   
> email: wpeter@us.ibm.com                                            
>                                                                     
> -                                                                   
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe           
linux-kernel" in                                                      
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org                  
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html  
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/                    
>                                                                     

  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-18 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-18 21:03 [PATCH] Encountered a Null Pointer Problem on the SCSI Layer Peter Wong
2002-02-18 23:01 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2002-02-19  0:04   ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-02-19 11:55     ` Stephan von Krawczynski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200202182301.AAA23425@webserver.ithnet.com \
    --to=skraw@ithnet.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=wpeter@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.