From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>,
Linux-Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BK Kernel Hacking HOWTO
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 12:29:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020226122933.C10806@work.bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020226113402.K12832@lynx.adilger.int> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0202262117380.8085-100000@vervain.sonytel.be>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0202262117380.8085-100000@vervain.sonytel.be>; from geert@linux-m68k.org on Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 09:19:46PM +0100
> So in case he wants a few csets only, I have to redo my for-Him-to-pull-tree.
> In which case I don't see any advantages compared to emailing a patch with
> changeset- and file-specific comments. Especially since setting up a
> for-Him-to-pull-tree requires setting up a publically accessible BK server.
You can set up a publically accessible tree here, if you need one,
see the Hosting link on our website. You can make your tree publically
accessible in multiple ways, with varying levels of security, see
"bk help bkd".
The advantage of allowing him to pull is that you won't have the same data
in your BK tree twice, which you would have if you sent him diffs and then
pulled the diffs from him. This is ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT if you have renames
(and creates/deletes are a sort of rename) in your patch.
If the situation is that you've created a scratch tree, specifically for
sending stuff to Linus and you aren't going to use it for anything else
or build on it, then you can send him regular diffs, and toss the tree
once you know he accepted them.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-26 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-21 16:13 BK Kernel Hacking HOWTO Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 16:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 16:40 ` Stelian Pop
2002-02-21 18:40 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-22 11:44 ` Stelian Pop
2002-02-26 17:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-02-26 18:34 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-26 20:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-02-26 20:29 ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2002-02-26 20:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-02-26 20:57 ` Andreas Dilger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-21 16:54 willy tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020226122933.C10806@work.bitmover.com \
--to=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=adilger@turbolabs.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.