All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
To: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com>,
	"Dennis, Jim" <jdennis@snapserver.com>,
	"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Congrats Marcelo,
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 00:00:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020227000024.G6197@werewolf.able.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2D0AFEFEE711D611923E009027D39F2B153AD4@cdserv.meridian-data.com> <20020226140644.U12832@lynx.adilger.int> <1014760581.5993.159.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <1014760581.5993.159.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com>; from lord@sgi.com on mar, feb 26, 2002 at 22:56:21 +0100


On 20020226 Steve Lord wrote:
>On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 15:06, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>> On Feb 26, 2002  12:38 -0800, Dennis, Jim wrote:
>> >  Now I need to know about the status of several unofficial patches:
>> 
>> While my word is by no means official, my general understanding is:
>> 
>> > 	XFS
>> 
>> Not for 2.4 - just too many changes to the core kernel code.
>
>Someone has got to kill this assumption people have about XFS, it
>makes much smaller changes than some things which have gone in,
>the odd VM rewrite here and there to name some. Given that we now
>have official EA system calls, the last chunk of stuff to resolve
>is quota. This is being worked on with Jan Kara.
>

AFAIK, it does not so many changes but duplicates half the fs 
infrastructure already present in kernel just to have a common
codebase with IRIX.

Is this still true ?
Is anybody working in kill all the dups ?
 
-- 
J.A. Magallon                           #  Let the source be with you...        
mailto:jamagallon@able.es
Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
Linux werewolf 2.4.18-jam1 #1 SMP Tue Feb 26 00:06:55 CET 2002 i686

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-02-26 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-26 20:38 Congrats Marcelo, Dennis, Jim
2002-02-26 20:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-26 21:06 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-26 21:15   ` crypto (was Re: Congrats Marcelo,) Jeff Garzik
2002-02-26 21:35     ` Robert Love
2002-02-26 21:40       ` arjan
2002-02-26 21:47         ` Robert Love
2002-02-24 23:51           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-28 22:32             ` Bill Davidsen
2002-03-01  9:50               ` Francois Romieu
2002-02-27  9:41       ` Francois Romieu
2002-02-26 22:33     ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-27 21:15       ` Michael H. Warfield
2002-02-27 21:57         ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-27 22:29           ` Michael H. Warfield
2002-02-27 23:06             ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-26 21:56   ` Congrats Marcelo, Steve Lord
2002-02-24 23:39     ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:07       ` Steve Lord
2002-02-25  0:10         ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:23       ` Rainer Ellinger
2002-02-25  0:38         ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:59         ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-02-27  0:47           ` Rainer Ellinger
2002-02-27  1:03             ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-02-27  1:08             ` Matthew D. Pitts
2002-02-26 22:59     ` Alan Cox
2002-02-26 22:59       ` Steve Lord
2002-02-25  0:28         ` Whither XFS? (was: Congrats Marcelo) Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:39           ` Steve Lord
2002-02-25  8:22             ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:00     ` J.A. Magallon [this message]
2002-02-28 21:52 ` Congrats Marcelo, Marcelo Tosatti
2002-03-01  0:01   ` Alan Cox
2002-03-01  0:37     ` Dave Jones
2002-03-01  1:13       ` Alan Cox
2002-03-01  1:03         ` Dave Jones
2002-03-01  1:51           ` Alan Cox
2002-03-01  1:28     ` Theodore Tso
2002-03-01  1:53       ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-02 22:35         ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2002-03-02  3:43   ` Stephen Degler
2002-02-28 22:41 ` Bill Davidsen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-01  9:30 Andries.Brouwer
2002-03-01 18:33 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-02  4:13 Dennis, Jim
2002-03-02 18:24 ` David Ford
2002-03-03 22:58 ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020227000024.G6197@werewolf.able.es \
    --to=jamagallon@able.es \
    --cc=adilger@turbolabs.com \
    --cc=jdennis@snapserver.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lord@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.